RESUMO
Auricular reconstruction remains a challenging procedure, requiring a high degree of manual dexterity and attention to detail in order to reconstruct the complex three-dimensional geometry of the ear successfully. Most techniques will rely on autologous cartilage for auricular framework fabrication, carrying a risk of donor and recipient site morbidity. The aim of this report is to investigate the complications and aesthetic outcomes associated with autologous cartilage harvest in auricular reconstruction. A systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Comprehensive electronic search strategies for four databases were developed. Studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. The literature search identified 7171 articles. Filtering for relevance and duplication reduced the number of articles to 52. A total of 12,215 patients underwent auricular reconstruction utilising autologous cartilage. Indications included 11,696 patients due to microtia, 334 patients due to burns or trauma, 70 patients due to constricted ears, and 115 patients due to prominent ears. The most commonly reported donor site complications included chest wall deformities (n = 159). The most commonly reported recipient site complications included hypertrophic or keloid scars (n = 279), haematoma (n = 155), tissue expander exposure (n = 111), cartilage or framework exposure (n = 122), and cartilage framework deformation or resorption (n = 50). Although a challenging procedure, auricular reconstruction utilising autologous cartilage is possible. Exceptional aesthetic results can be achieved when performed by a skilled surgeon on appropriately selected individuals. However, the potential risks and complications associated with the procedure should be discussed with the patient and family beforehand.
RESUMO
Introduction: Fractures of the orbit are common injuries within the maxillofacial skeleton, and can often result in restrictions to ocular movement, diplopia, and enophthalmous if herniation of globe content occurs. Various studies have demonstrated the use of autologous cartilage grafts in the reconstruction of orbital fractures. Methods: A systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Comprehensive electronic search strategies of four databases were developed. Studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Results: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-one articles were identified following a comprehensive literature search. These articles were filtered for relevance and duplication, which reduced the number of articles to 16. A total of 259 patients underwent orbital reconstruction with the use of autologous cartilage. Conchal cartilage was harvested in 148 patients, auricular cartilage in 22 patients, nasoseptal cartilage in 72 patients, and costal cartilage in 17 patients. Thirty, seven, twelve, and four complications were observed in patients where cartilage was harvested from the concha, auricle, nasoseptum and rib, respectively. Most common complications included diplopia (n=23), infra-orbital para/anaesthesia (n=27), and enophthalmos (n=7). No failure of graft or donor site morbidity were observed in the studies. Conclusion: Autogenous materials such as cartilage can be used as an alternative for orbital reconstruction. Cartilage was considered by the authors to provide adequate structural support to the orbital contents, and that it was easy to harvest, shape, and position.
